top of page
Search

Brave New Machines: How are drones changing the security and executive protection landscape?


In today's rapidly changing drone landscape, protecting high-profile, high-net-worth individuals, and family offices presents unprecedented challenges. As drones become more sophisticated and accessible, their potential for malicious use has increased, posing significant risks on land, sea, and air. 


Over the last three years, we have witnessed the rapid development of new drone capabilities, tactics, and techniques used on the battlefield in Ukraine and in other theatres. Unmanned systems have developed a dynamic and effective new capability for warfighters.  To keep pace with these advancements, defensive capabilities against drones are rapidly evolving.

These machines, while providing numerous benefits, also pose novel threats that necessitate innovative executive protection measures. The ease of access, advanced capabilities, and proven attack tactics all pose significant risks to protection details.

Drones, in particular, provide executive protection professionals with a new defensive capability while also posing a potentially lethal new threat.

There are numerous questions to consider in the landscape, including whether drones still allow for high-profile movements of executives, high-profile individuals, and government officials.


The drone threat landscape

Emerging drone threats pose significant challenges for family offices and high-profile individuals seeking to ensure their safety in a world where these new multidimensional threats can come from any direction and can be deployed relatively cheaply but with powerful nefarious effects.


Surveillance Threats: Drones outfitted with high-resolution cameras can conduct covert surveillance, collecting sensitive information about high-profile individuals, their routines, security protocols, and locations. This information may be used to plan attacks or other malicious activities.


Direct Attack Threats: Drones can be equipped with explosives or other dangerous materials for direct attacks. These precision-targeted devices can overcome physical barriers and deliver payloads to previously inaccessible locations, rendering traditional security measures ineffective.


Distraction and Diversion: Drones can divert security attention away from the primary target, allowing for other types of attacks or security breaches.


Cyber Threats: Sophisticated drones can carry devices capable of intercepting communications, hacking networks, or disrupting electronic systems inside a security perimeter, posing a significant cyber threat.


Smuggling and Contraband Delivery: Drones are already being used to smuggle contraband, such as weapons, drugs, and other illegal items, into restricted areas. This capability is especially concerning for the security of high-profile individuals because it allows for the direct delivery of dangerous materials to their vicinity, circumventing traditional security measures.


Interference with Communications and GPS: Drones equipped with jamming devices can disrupt communications and GPS signals, causing confusion and disorientation. This can impede security team coordination and the effective deployment of defensive measures, making them more vulnerable to attack.


Environmental and Infrastructure Sabotage: Drones have the potential to sabotage critical infrastructure such as power lines, communication towers, and transportation systems. This can cause widespread disruption and chaos, indirectly endangering the safety and security of high-profile individuals by destabilizing their surroundings.


What questions should security professionals consider about the emerging drone threat?


Detection Capabilities: What systems do we have in place to detect unauthorized drones in our area? Do we have the resources to protect our assets (e.g., homes, yachts, offices)? Are the systems effective against the most recent drone technologies, whether ground-, air-, or water-based?


Response Protocols: Do we have clear protocols for dealing with drone threats? Are all security personnel regularly trained and prepared to carry out these protocols effectively?


Electronic Countermeasures: What electronic countermeasures are available to us, and are they adequate to disrupt potential drone threats?


Physical Countermeasures: Do we have physical countermeasures in place to neutralize drones that enter our airspace?


Cybersecurity: How secure are our communication channels and networks against potential cyber-attacks by drones? How can we take additional steps to improve cybersecurity?


Legal, Regulatory, Policies, and Compliance: Have we set up and enforced no-fly zones around critical areas? Are there any legal or regulatory concerns that we should address in our drone countermeasures? Are we fully compliant with local, national, and international regulations governing the use of counter-drone measures?  Are we balancing drone defense measures with privacy concerns to avoid violating personal rights?


Scenario Planning: Are we applying a data-driven approach to drone security and incorporating previous lessons learned into our overall security planning process? Have we carried out scenario planning and drills for potential drone threats, such as multi-drone attacks and diversions? How ready are we, and those we protect, for these scenarios? Have we used a red team to identify potential vulnerabilities in our drone defense systems?  Has a third party reviewed our drone defense plan and response scenarios?


Technological Updates: How frequently do we update our anti-drone technologies and protocols to keep up with local and global drone and counter-drone technological advancements?  Are we investing in R&D to stay ahead of potential drone threats through innovative solutions? 


Coordination with Law Enforcement: How coordinated are we with law enforcement and government agencies in the event of a drone threat? Are there established communication channels and protocols for collaboration?


Stakeholder Awareness and Reporting: Have we implemented stakeholder awareness programs to help them identify and report suspicious drone activity?


Emergency Response Integration: How integrated are our drone threat response plans with broader emergency response strategies, such as evacuation procedures and medical assistance?  Are personnel across various security roles cross-trained to handle drone threats, ensuring versatility in our defense strategy? 


Resource Allocation: Are we allocating enough resources (financial, security intelligence, and human) to effectively address and counter drone threats?


Cross-Domain Threat Integration: How well do our anti-drone measures integrate with other risk domains, such as cyber, physical, and personnel security, to form a comprehensive defense strategy? Are we monitoring cross-domain international tactics, trends, and developments in drone technology and threats to ensure our protective measures are globally informed and up-to-date?


Supply Chain Security: Are we ensuring that the technology and equipment we use to defend drones are secure and free of supply chain vulnerabilities?  How secure are the third-party vendors and contractors involved in our drone defense solutions? Are they compliant with our security standards?


Insurance and Liability: Have we reviewed our insurance coverage and liability in relation to drone threats? Are there any gaps that should be filled?


Training and Certification: Are our security personnel regularly trained and certified in the latest drone defense technologies and tactics?  Are we using behavioral analysis techniques to anticipate and mitigate potential drone threats based on observed patterns?nd executive protection professionals should consider when developing an unmanned vehicle protection strategy.

Comments


bottom of page